Aaserud, M., 1996: Costs and Benefits of Climate Policies: An Integrated
Economy-Energy-Environment Model Approach for Norway. In Modelling the Economy
and the Environment. B. Madsen, C. Jensen-Butler, J.B. Mortensen, A.M. Bruun
Christensen,(eds.), Springer, Berlin.
Aasness, J., T. Bye, and H. T. Mysen, 1996: Welfare effects of emission
taxes in Norway. Energy Economics, 18(4), 335-46.
ABARE-DFAT, 1995: Global Climate Change. Economic Dimensions of a
Global Policy Response Beyond 2000. ABARE, Canberra, Australia.
Abt Associates, 1997: International PM Mortality Impacts in 2020 from
Greenhouse Gas Policies. Memorandum, Environmental Research Area, USA.
Abt Associates, and Pechan-Avanti Group, 1999: Co-Control Benefits
of Greenhouse Gas Control Policies. Prepared for the Office of Policy, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Contract No. 68-W4-0029.
Adegbulugbe, A.O., F.I. Ibitoye, W.O. Siyanbola, G.A. Oladosu, J.F.K.
Akiubonu, et al., 1997: GHG Emission Mitigation in Nigeria. In Global
Climate Change Mitigation Assessment: Results from 14 transitioning and developing
countries, US Country Studies Program, Washington, DC.
Adi, A.C., C.L. Malik, and A. Nurrohim, 1997: Mitigation of CO2
from Indonesias Energy System. Applied Energy, 56(3-4),
253-263.
Alfsen, K., H. Birkelund and M. Aaserud, 1995: Impacts of an EC Carbon/Energy
Tax and Deregulating Thermal Power Supply on CO2, SO2
and NOx Emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics 5,
165-189
ALGAS (Asian Least-Cost Greenhouse Gas Abatement Strategy), 1999a:
Summary Report. Asian Development Bank, Manila.
ALGAS, 1999b: Profiles of Investment and Technical Assistance.
Greenhouse Gas Abatement Projects. Asian Development Bank, Manila.
ALGAS, 1999c: Peoples Republic of China.
1999d. Republic of Korea.
1999e. Myanmar.
1999f. Pakistan.
1999g. Philippines.
1999h. Thailand. Asian Development Bank, Manila.
Almon, C., 1991: The INFORUM Approach to Interindustry Modelling. Economic
Systems Research, 3, 1-7.
Andersen, F.M., H.K. Jacobsen, P.E Morthorst, A. Olsen, M. Rasmussen,
T. Thomsen, and P. Trier, 1998: EMMA: En energi- og miljørelateret satellitmodel
til ADAM (EMMA an energy and environmental satellite model related to ADAM).
Nationaløkonomisk Tidsskrift, 136(3), 333-349.
Anderson, J., R. Morgenstern, and M. Toman, 1999: The Rationale for
Flexibility in the Design of Greenhouse Gas Abatement Policies: A Review of
Economic Issues. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Arrow, K., 1962: The Economic Implication of Learning by Doing. Review
of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173.
Aunan, K., H.A. Aaheim, and H.M. Seip, 2000: Reduced Damage to Health
and Environment from Energy Saving in Hungary. Expert Workshop on Assessing
the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March
27-29, Washington, DC.
Babiker, M., M. E. Bautista, H. D. Jacoby, and J. M. Reilly, 2000: Effects
of Differentiating Climate Policy by Sector: A U.S. Example. In Sectoral
Economic Costs and Benefits of GHG Mitigation, Proceedings of the IPCC Expert
Meeting, February 14-15, 2000, L. Bernstein, J. Pan, (eds.), Eisensach, Germany.
Bahn, O., E. Fragnière, and S. Kypreos, 1996: Swiss Energy Taxation
Options to Curb CO2 Emissions. Conference Proceedings, The
1996 European Environment Conference, West Yorkshire, UK, pp.1-6.
Bahn, O., A. Haurie, S. Kypreos, and J.-P. Vial, 1998: Advanced Mathematical
Programming Modeling to Assess the Benefits from International CO2
Abatement Cooperation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 3,
107-115.
Bahn, O., A. Cadena, and S. Kypreos, 1999a: Joint Implementation of CO2
Emission Reduction Measures between Switzerland and Colombia. International
Journal of Environment and Pollution, 11, 1-12.
Bahn, O., S. Kypreos, B. Bueler, and H. J. Luthi, 1999b: Modelling an
International Market of CO2 Emission Permits. International Journal
of Global Energy Issues, 12(1-6), 283-291.
Bailie, A., B. Sadownik, A. Taylor, M. Nanduri, R. Murphy, J. Nyboer,
M. Jaccard, and A. Pape, 1998: Cost Curve Estimation for Reducing CO2
Emissions in Canada: An Analysis by Province and Sector. Office of Energy
Efficiency, Natural Resources, Canada.
Barker, T., 1993: Secondary Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Abatement: The
Effects of a UK Carbon/Energy Tax on Air Pollution. Energy-Environment-Economy
Modelling. Discussion Paper N°4, ESRC Research Project on Policy Options
for Sustainable Energy Use in a General Model of the Economy.
Barker, T., 1997. Taxing pollution instead of jobs: Towards more employment
without more inflation through fiscal reform in the UK. Ecotaxation,
T. ORiordan, (ed.), Earthscan Publ., London.
Barker, T., 1998a: Policy Evaluation in a Multi-sectoral Framework. European-US
Conference on Post-Kyoto Strategies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Barker, T, 1998b: The Effects on Competitiveness of Coordinated versus
Unilateral Fiscal Policies Reducing GHG Emissions in the EU: An Assessment of
a 10% Reduction by 2010 Using the E3ME Model. Energy Policy, 26(14),
1083-1098.
Barker, T. 1998c: The Use of Energy-Environment-Economy Models to Inform
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policy, Special Section.In Impact Assessment and
Project Appraisal: Reflections on the Use of Models in Policy Making, S.
Shackley, (ed.), 16(2), June 1998, pp. 133-131.
Barker, T., 1999: Achieving a 10% cut in Europes CO2 Emissions
using Additional Excise Duties: Coordinated, Uncoordinated and Unilateral Action
Using the Econometric Model E3ME. Economic Systems Research, 11 (4),
401-421.
Barker, T., and N. Johnstone, 1993: Equity and Efficiency in Policies
to Reduce Carbon Emissions in the Domestic Sector . Energy & Environment,
4 (4), 335-361.
Barker, T., and J. Kohler, 1998: Equity and Ecotax Reform in the EU:
Achieving a 10% Reduction in CO2 Emissions Using Excise Duties. Fiscal Studies,
19 (4), 375-402.
Barker, T., and K.E. Rosendahl, 2000: Ancillary Benefits of GHG Mitigation
in Europe: SO2, NOx and PM10 reductions from policies to meet Kyoto targets
using the E3ME model and Externe valuations. Expert Workshop on Assessing the
Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29,
Washington, DC.
Berg, E., S. Kverndokk, and K. Rosendahl, 1997a: Gains from Cartelisation
in the Oil Market. Energy Policy, 25(13), 1075-1091.
Berg, E., S. Kverndokk,, and K. E. Rosendahl, 1997b: Market Power, International
CO2 Taxation and Petroleum Wealth. The Energy Journal, 18(4), 33-71.
Bergman, L.,1995: Sectoral Differentiation as a Substitute for International
Coordination of Carbon Taxes: A Case Study of Sweden. In Environmental Policy
with Political and Economic Integration. J. Braden , T. Ulen, (eds.), Edward
Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Bernard, A.L., and M. Vielle. 1999a: Efficient Allocation of a Global
Environment Cost between Countries : Tradable Permits VERSUS Taxes or Tradable
Permits AND Taxes ? An appraisal with a World General Equilibrium Model. Working
Paper, Ministère de léquipement des transports et du logement,
France.
Bernard, A.L., and M. Vielle. 1999b: The Pure Economics of Tradable Pollution
Permits. Working paper, Ministère de léquipement des transports
et du logement, France.
Bernard, A.L., and M. Vielle. 1999c. Rapport à la Mission Interministérielle
sur lEffet de Serre relatif aux évaluation du Protocole de Kyoto
effectuées avec le modèle GEMINI-E3 (Report to the MIES on the
greenhouse effect: An evaluation of the Kyoto Protocol with the GEMINI-E3 Model,
Ministère de léquipement des transports et du logement,
Commissariat à lénergie atomique, France.
Bernstein, P., D. Montgomery, and T. Rutherford, 1999: Global Impacts
of the Kyoto Agreement: Results from the MS-MRT model. Resource and Energy Economics,
21(3-4), 375-413.
Böhringer, C. , 1997: NEWAGE - Modellinstrumentarium zur gesamtwirtschaftlichen
Analyse von Energie- und Umweltpolitiken, In Energiemodelle in der Bundesrepublik
Deutschland - Stand der Entwicklung, S. Molt, U. Fahl, (ed.), Jülich, Germany,
pp. 99-121.
Böhringer, C. , 2000: Cooling Down Hot Air - A Global CGE Analysis
of Post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies, Energy Polic, 28, 779-789.
Böhringer, C., and T.F. Rutherford, 1997: Carbon Taxes with Exemptions
in an Open Economy - A General Equilibrium Analysis of the German Tax Initiative.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 189-203.
Böhringer, C., T.F. Rutherford, 1999: Decomposing General Equilibrium
Effects of Policy Intervention in Multi-Regional Trade Models - Methods and
Sample Application. ZEW Discussion Paper 99-36, Mannheim, Germany.
Böhringer, C., T.F. Rutherford, 2001: World Economic Impacts of
the Kyoto Protocol. In Internalization of the Economy, Environmental Problems
and New Policy Options, P.J.J. Welfens, R. Hillebrand, A. Ulph, (eds.), Springer,
Heidelberg/New York.
Böhringer, C., et al., 1997: Volkswirtschaftliche Effekte
einer Umstrukturierung des deutschen Steuersystems unter besonderer Berücksichtigung
von Umweltsteuern. Forschungsbericht des Instituts für Energiewirtschaft
und Rationelle Energieanwendung, Universität Stuttgart, Band 37, Stuttgart.
Borja-Aburto, V.H., D.P. Loomis, S.I. Bangdiwala, C.M. Shy, and R.A.
Rascon-Pacheco, 1997: Ozone, Suspended Particulates and Daily Mortality in Mexico
City. American Journal of Epidemiology 145(3), 258-68.
Borja-Aburto, V.H., M. Castillejos, D. R. Gold, S. Bierzwinski, and D.
Loomis, 1998: Mortality and Ambient fine Particles in Southwest Mexico City,
1993-1995. Environmental Health Perspectives, 106, 849-855.
Bovenberg, A. L., and L.H. Goulder, 2001: Neutralizing the Adverse Industry
Impacts of CO2 Abatement Policies: What Does It Cost? In Behavioral and Distributional
Effects of Environmental Policies, C. Carraro , G. Metcalf, ( eds.), University
of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.
Boyd, R., K. Krutilla and W.K. Viscusi, 1995: Energy Taxation as a Policy
Instrument to Reduce CO2 Emissions: A Net Benefit Analysis. Journal of Environmental
Economics and Management, 29(1), 1-25.
Braga, A., G. Conceicao, L. Pereira, H. Kishi, J. Pereira, and M. Andrade,
1999: Air Pollution and Pediatric Hospital Admissions in Sao Paulo. Journal
of Environmental Medicine 1, 95-102.
Brännlund, R., and I.-M. Gren, 1999: Green Taxes in Sweden: A Partial
Equilibrium Analysis of the Carbon Tax and the Tax on Nitrogen in Fertilizers.
In Green Taxes Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence from Scandinavia.
R. Brännlund, I-M. Gren, (eds.), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Bråten, J., and R. Golombek, 1998: OPECs Response to International
Climate Agreements. Environmental and Resource Economics, 12(4), 425-42.
Brendemoen, A., and H. Vennemo, 1994: A Climate Treaty and the Norwegian
Economy: A CGE Assessment. The Energy Journal, 15(1), 77-93.
Brown et al., 1997a: Scenarios of U.S. Carbon Reductions: Potential
Impacts of Energy Technologies by 2010 and Beyond. Prepared by ORNL, LBNL, PNNL,
NREL, ANL for the U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Brown, S., D. Donovan, B. Fisher, K. Hanslow, M. Hinchy, M. Matthewson,
C. Polidano, V. Tulpulé, and S. Wear, 1997b: The Economic Impact of International
Climate Change Policy. ABARE Research Report 97.4, Canberra, Australia.
Brown, M., M. Levine, J. Romm, A. Rosenfeld, and J. Koomey, 1998: Engineering-Economics
Studies of Energy Technologies to reduce GHG emissions: Opportunities and Challenges.
Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 23, 287-385.
Brown, S., D. Kennedy, C. Polidano, K. Woffenden, G. Jakeman, B. Graham,
F. Jotzo, and B. Fisher, 1999: Economic Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol: Accounting
for the Three Major Greenhouse Gases. ABARE Research Report 99.6, Canberra,
Australia.
Brown et al. 2000: A Clean Energy Future for the US, prepared
by ORNL, LBNL, PNNL, NREL, ANL for the U.S. Department of Energy, Washington,
DC.
Burtraw, D., and M. Toman, 1997: The Benefits of Reduced Air Pollutants
in the U.S. from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies. Discussion Paper 98-01-REV,
Resources for the Future, USA.
Burtraw, D., A. Krupnick, K. Palmer, A. Paul, M. Toman, and C. Bloyd,
1999: Ancillary Benefits of Reduced Air Pollution in the US from Moderate Greenhouse
Gas Mitigation Policies in the Electricity Sector. Discussion Paper 99-51, Resources
for the Future, USA.
Bye, B., 2000: Environmental Tax Reform and Producer Foresight: An Intertemporal
Computable General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22,(6),
719-752.
Bye, B., and K. Nyborg, 1999: The Welfare Effects of Carbon Policies:
Grandfathered Quotas versus Differentiated Taxes. Discussion Papers 261, Statistics
Norway, Norway.
Capros, P., L. Mantzos, L. Vouyoukas, and D. Petrellis, 1999a: European
Energy and CO2 Emissions Trends to 2020. Paper presented at IEA/EMF/IIASA Energy
Modelling Meeting, Paris, June 1999, 1-18.
Capros, P., L. Mantzos, P. Criqui, Kouvaritakis, Sorai, Scrattenkolzer,
and L. Vouyoukas, 1999b: Climate Technology Strategy 1: Controling Grenhouse
Gases. Policy and Technology Options. Springer Verlag eds., Berlin.
Capros, P., T. Georgakopoulos, D. Van Regemorter, S. Proost, T.F.N Schmidt,
K. Conrad, and L. Vouyoukas, 1999c: Climate Technology Strategy: Controlling
Greenhouse Gases 2: The Macroeconomic Costs and Benefits of Reducing Greenhouse
Gases Emissions in the European Union. Springer Verlag eds., Berlin.
Carraro, C., and M. Galeotti, 1995: Voluntary agreements: A macro-economic
assessment. Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Bergamo,
Italy, June.
Carraro, C., and A. Soubeyran, 1996: Environmental Taxation and Employment
in a Multi-sector General Equilibrium Model. In Environmental Fiscal Reform
and Unemployment. Kluwer Academnic Publishers, London.
Chung, W., Y. June Wu, and J. D. Fuller, 1997: Dynamic Energy Environment
Equilibrium Model for the Assessment of CO2 Emission in Canada and the USA.
Energy Economics, 19, 103-124.
Cifuentes, L., J.J. Prieto, et al., 1999: Valuation of mortalitiy risk
reductions at present and at an advanced age: Preliminary results from a contingent
valuation study. Annual Meeting of the Latin American and Caribean Economic
Association, Santiago, Chile.
Cifuentes, L., E. Sauma, H. Jorquera, and F. Soto, 2000: Co-controls
Benefits Analysis for Chile: Preliminary estimation of the potential co-control
benefits for Chile. COP-5: Progress Report (Revised Version), L.A. Cifuentes,
E. Sauma, H.Jorquera, F. Soto, (eds.), 12 Nov 1999.
Conniffe, D., J. Fitz Gerald, S. Scott, and F. Shortall, 1997: The Costs
to Ireland of GHG Abatement. ESRI (Economic and Social Research Institute),
Dublin. See also: B.O.Cleirgh, 1998: Environmental Resources Management, Economic
Research Institute; Limitation and Reduction of CO2 and other Greenhouse Gas
Emissions in Ireland. Government of Ireland, Dublin.
Conrad, K., and T. F. N. Schmidt, 1997: Double Dividend of Climate Protection
and the Role of International Policy Coordination in the E.U: An Applied General
Equilibrium Model Analysis with the GEM-E3 Model. ZEW Discussion Paper n°
97-26.
Contaldi, M., and G.C. Tosato, 1999: Carbon Tax and its Mitigation Effect
through Technology Substitution: An Evaluation for Italy. Proceedings of 22nd
IAEE Annual International Conference, Rome, June 9-12, 1999.
Coppel, J., and H. Lee, 1995: Model Simulations: Assumptions and Results.
In Global Warming: Economic Dimensions and Policy Responses, OECD, pp. 74-84.
Cornwell, A., and J. Creedy 1996: Carbon Taxation, Prices and Inequality
in Australia, Fiscal Studies, 17(3), 21-38.
Council of Economic Advisors, 1998: The Kyoto Protocol and the Presidents
Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis. Washington,
DC.
Criqui, P. and N. Kouvaritakis, 1997: Les coûts pour le secteur
énergétique de la réduction des émissions de CO2:
une évaluation avec le modèle POLES. To be published in les actes
du Colloque de Fontevraud: Quel environnement au XXIème siècle?
Environnement, maîtrise du long-terme et démocratie, 20 pp.
Criqui, P., S. Mima, and L. Viguer, 1999: Marginal Abatement Costs of
CO2 emission Reductions, Geographical Flexibility and Concrete Ceilings: An
Assessment Using the POLES Model. Energy Policy, 27(10), 585-602.
Cropper, M., N. Simon, A. Alberini, S. Arora, and P.K. Sharma, 1997:
The Health Benefits of Air Pollution Control in Delhi. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics, 79(5), 1625-1629.
Danish Economic Council, 1997: Dansk økonomi, efterår 1997
(Danish Economy, Autumn 1997). Danish Economic Council, Copenhagen.
Davis, D., 1997: The Hidden Benefits of Climate Policy: Reducing Fossil
Fuel use Saves Lives Now. Environmental Health, Notes 1-6.
Davis, D.L., A. Krupnick, and G. Thurston, 2000: The Ancillary Health
Benefits and Costs of GHG Mitigation: Scope, Scale, and Credibility. Expert
Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation
Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Dessus, S., and D. OConnor, 1999: Climate Policy Without Tears:
CGE-Based Ancillary Benefits Estimates for Chile. OECD Development Centre.
Dixit, A., and V. Norman, 1984: Theory of International Trade: A Dual
General Equilibrium Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Donovan, D., K. Schneider, G. Tessema, and B. Fisher, 1997: International
Climate Change Policy: Impacts on Developing Countries. ABARE Research Report
97.8, Canberra, Australia.
ECON, 1997: Avgiftenes rolle i klimapolitikken (The role of taxes in
the climate policy). ECON report n°60/97, ECON Centre for Economic Analysis,
Oslo.
Edmonds, J., M. Wise, and D. Barns, 1995: Carbon Coalitions: The Cost
and Effectiveness of Energy Agreements to Alter Trajectories of Atmospheric
Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Energy Policy, 23(4/5), 309-336.
Ekins, P., 1996: How Large a Carbon Tax is justified by the Secondary
Benefits of CO2 Abatement. Resource and Energy Economics, 18(2), 161-187.
Ellerman, A.D., and I. Sue Wing, 2000: Supplementarity: A Invitation
for Monopsony, Report n°59, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global
Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
EMF-14 (Energy Modelling Forum) Working Group, 1997: Integrated Assessment
of Climate Change. The EMF 14 Working Group, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum,
Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
EMF-16 (Energy Modelling Forum), Working Group 1999: Economic and Energy
System Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol: Results from the Energy Modeling Forum
Study. The EMF 16 Working Group, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, July 1999.
EIA (Energy Information Administration), 1998: Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol
on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity. Washington, US Department of Energy.
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1999: The Benefits and Costs
of the Clean Air Act, 1990 to 2010. EPA-410-R-99-001
European Commission, 1999: ExternE: Externalities of Energy. European
Commission, DGXII, Science, Research and Development, JOULE.
Farzin, Y., and O. Tahvonen, 1996: Global Carbon Cycle and the Optimal
Time Path of a Carbon Tax. Oxford Economic Papers, 48(4), 515-36.
Fitz Gerald, J., and D. McCoy, 1992: The Macroeconomic Implications for
Ireland. In The Economic Effects of Carbon
Taxes. Policy Research Series, Paper No. 14, J. Fitz Gerald, D. McCoy, (eds.),
Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
Frandsen, S.E., J. V. Hansen, and P. Trier, 1995: GESMEC - En generel
ligevægtsmodel for Danmark. Dokumentation og anvendelser (GESMEC
An applied general equilibrium model for Denmark Documentation and applications).
The Secretariat of the Economic Council, Copenhagen.
Fortin, E., 1999. Etude des effets redistributifs dune taxe sur
le carbone et lénergie à laide du modèle IMACLIM
(Distributive impacts of a Carbon Tax: A Study with the IMACLIM Model). Internal
Document, CIRED, France.
Garbaccio, R.F., M.S. Ho and D.W. Jorgenson, 1999: Controlling Carbon
Emissions in China. Environment and Development Economics, 4(4 Oct),
493-518
Garbaccio, R.F., M.S. Ho and D.W. Jorgenson, 2000: The Health Benefits
of Controlling Carbon Emissions in China. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary
Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington,
DC.
Gielen, D.J., 1999: The Impact of GHG Emission Reduction on the Western
European Materials System. In Material Technologies for Greenhouse Gas Emission
Reduction, D.J.Gielen, (ed), Workshop Proceedings, April 1998, Utrecht. Netherlands
Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten /Dutch National Research Programme on
Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, The Netherlands, 3-16.
Gielen, D.J. and J.H.M. Pieters, 1999: Instruments and Technologies for
Climate Change Policy: An Integrated Energy and Materials Systems Modeling Approach.
Paris, OECD, Environment Directorate, Environment Policy Committee, ENV/EPOC/GEEI(99)15.
Gielen, D.J., P.R. Koutstaal, T. Kram, and S.N.M. van Rooijen, 1999a:
Post-Kyoto: Effects on the Climate Policy of the European Union. In Dealing
with Uncertainty Together. Summary of Annex VI (1996-1998). T. Kram (Project
Head), International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme
(ETSAP).
Gielen, D., S. Franssen, A. Seebregts, and T. Kram, 1999b: Markal for
Policy Instrument Assessment - The OECD TOG Project. Paper prepared for the
IEA/ETSAP Annex VII Workshop, Washington, DC, 1-12.
Gielen, D., T. Kram, and H. Brezet, 1999c: Integrated Energy and Materials
Scenarios for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation. Paper prepared for the IEA/DOE/EPA
Workshop Technologies to Reduce GHG Emissions: Engineering-Economic Analysis
of Conserved Energy and Carbon, Washington, DC, 1-15.
Glomsrød, S., H. Vennemo, and T. Johnsen, 1992: Stabilisation
of Emissions of CO2: A Computable General Equilibrium Assessment. The Scandinavian
Journal of Economics, 94(1), 53-69.
Glueck, H., and S. Schleicher, 1995: Endogenous Technological Progress
Induced by CO2 Reductions Policies. Environmental and Ressources Economics,
5, 151-153.
Gold, D., A. Damakosh, A. Pope, D. Dockery, W. McDonnell, P Serrano,
S. Retama, and M. Castillejos, 1999: Particulate and Ozone Pollutant Effect
on the Respiratory Function of Children in Southwest Mexico City. Epidemiology,
10(1), 8-17.
Golombek, R., C. Hagem, and M. Hoel, 1995: Efficient Incomplete International
Climate Agreements. Resource-and-Energy-Economics, 17(1), 25-46.
Gørtz, M., J.V., Hansen, and M. Larsen, 1999: CO2-skatter, dobbelt-dividende
og konkurrence i energietekorten. Anvendelser af den danske AGL-model ECOSMEC
(CO2 taxes, double dividend and competition in the energy sector: Applications
of the Danish CGE model ECOSMEC). Arbejdpapir, 1.
Goulder, L.H., 1995a: Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with Prior
Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis. Journal of Environmental
Economics and Management, 29, 271-297.
Goulder, L.H., 1995b: Environmental Taxation and The Double Dividend:
A Readers Guide.International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 157-183.
Goulder, L. H., and S. H. Schneider, 1999: Induced Technological Change
and the Attractiveness of CO2 Abatement Policies. Resource and Energy Economics,
21, 211-253.
Goulder, L. H. and K. Mathai, 2000: Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence
of Induced Technological Change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
39, 1-38.
Goulder, L.H., I.W.H. Parry, and D. Burtraw, 1997: Revenue-Raising versus
Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Pre-Existing
Tax Distortions. RAND Journal of Economics, Winter.
Goulder, L.H., I.W.H. Parry, C, Roberton, C. Williams III, and D. Burtraw,
1999: The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection
in a Second-best Setting. Journal of Public Economics, 72 (3), 329-360.
Grubb, M., 1997. Technologies, Energy Systems and the Timing of CO2 Abatement:
An Overview of Economic Issues. Energy Policy, 25, 159-172.
Grubb, M., 2000: Economic Dimensions of Technological and Global Responses
to the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Economic Studies, 27(1/2), 111-125
Grubb, M., T. Chapuis, and M. Ha Duong, 1995: The Economics of Changing
Course: Implications of Adaptability and Inertia for Optimal Climate Policy.
Energy Policy, 23(4/5).
Grubb, M., C. Vrolijk, and D. Brack, 1999: The Kyoto Protocol, a guide
and assessment. The Royal Institute of International Affairs and Earthscan Publ.,
London.
Grübler, A., and S. Messner, 1998: Technological Change and the
timing of Mitigation Measures. Energy Economics, 20, 495-512.
Güllen, G., 1996: Is OPEC a Cartel? Evidence from Co-integration
and Causality Tests. Energy Journal, 17(2), 43-57.
Ha-Duong, M., M. Grubb, and J-C. Hourcade, 1997: Influence of Socio-economic
Inertia and Uncertainty on Optimal CO2 Emission Abatement. Nature, 390,
270-273.
Ha-Duong, M., J-C. Hourcade and F. Lecocq, 1999: Dynamic Consistency
Problems behind the Kyoto Protocol. Int.J. Environment and Pollution, 11(4),
426-446.
Hagler Bailly, 1995: Final Report prepared by Hagler Bailly Consulting,
Inc., Boulder, Colorado, under subcontract to ICF Incorporated, Fairfax, VI
for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Acid Rain Division.
Håkonsen, L., and L. Mathiesen, 1997: CO2-Stabilization May Be
a No-Regrets Policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9(2),
171-98.
Halsnaes, K., and A. Markandya, 1999: Comparative Assessment of GHG Limitation
Costs and Ancillary Benefits in Country Studies for DCs and EITs. Working Paper,
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Denmark, June, 1-20.
Hamilton, K., and C. Cameron, 1994: Simulating the Distributional Effects
of a Carbon Tax. Canadian Public Policy, 20, 385-399.
Harrison, G. W., and B. Kriström, 1999: General Equilibrium Effects
of Increasing Carbon Taxes in Sweden. In Green Taxes - Economic Theory and Empirical
Evidence from Scandinavia. R. Brännlund, I-M. Gren, (eds.), Edward Elgar,
Cheltenham, UK.
Harrison, G.W., and T. Rutherford, 1999: Burden sharing, joint implementation
and carbon coalitions. In International Agreements on Climate Change, C. Carraro,
(ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Hauch, J., 1999: Elephant A Simulation Model for Environmental
Regulation at Nordic Energy Markets. PhD thesis, Danish Economic Council, Copenhagen.
Hertel, T., (ed.), 1997: Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 403 pp.
Hill, M. 1999: Green Tax Reforms in Sweden: The Second Dividend and the
Cost of Tax Exemptions. Beijer Discussion Paper Series No. 119, Beijer Institute
of Ecological Economics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm.
Hinchy, M., K. Hanslow, and B. Fisher, 1998: Gains from International
Emissions Trading in a General Equilibrium Framework. ABARE Working Paper.
Hoel, M., and S. Kverndokk, 1996: Depletion of fossil fuels and the impacts
of global warming. Resource and Energy Economics, 18(2), 115-136.
Hotelling, H., 1931: The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Journal
of Political Economy, 39, 137-175.
Hourcade, J-C., K. Heloui, and F. Ghersi. 2000a: Les déterminants
du double dividende décotaxes : Rôle du changement technique
et du risque dembauche (The Determinants of Double Dividend: The Importance
of Technical Change and Employment Risk). Economie et Prévisions, 143-144,
47-68.
Hourcade, J-C., P. Courtois, and T. Lepesant, 2000b: Socio-economic of
Policy Formation and Choices. In Climate Change and European Leadership. J.
Gupta, M. Grubb. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Huff, K., and T. Hertel, 1996: Decomposing Welfare Changes in the GTAP
Model. GTAP Technical Paper No. 5, Purdue University, USA, 80 pp.
IAT (Interagency Analytical Team), 1997: Climate Change Economic Analysis.
Technical Annex. Markal-Macro Modeling Analysis Supporting the Interagency Analytical
Team: Methodology, Technology Assumptions and Results.
Interlaboratory Working Group, 1997: Scenarios of US Carbon Reductions:
Potential Impacts of Energy efficient and Low Carbon Technologies by 2010 and
beyond. Oakridge and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories, CA, ORNL-444 and
LBNL-40533.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1995: Climate Change
1994: Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92
Emission Scenarios. J.T. Houghton et al., (eds.), Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 1996: Climate Change
1995. Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of Working
Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
IPCC, 2000: Emissions scenarios. A special report of Working Group III
of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Jaccard, M., A. Bailie, and J. Nyboer, 1996: CO2 Emission Reduction Costs
in the Residential Sector: Behavioral Parameters in a Bottom-up Simulation Model.
The Energy Journal, 17(4), 107-134.
Jacoby, H., R. Eckaus, D. Ellerman, R. Prinn, D. Reiner, and Z. Yang,
1997: CO2 Emission Limits: Economic Adjustments and the Distribution of Burdens.
The Energy Journal, 18(3), 31-58.
Jaffe, B., and R. N. Stavins, 1994: The Energy-Efficiency gap. What does
it mean?. Energy Policy, 22(10) 804-810.
Jensen, J., 1998: Carbon Abatement Policies with Assistance to Energy
Intensive Industry. Working paper No 2/98, The MobiDK Project, The Ministry
of Business and Industry, Copenhagen.
Jensen, J., and T. N. Rasmussen, 1998: Allocation of CO2 Emission Permits:
A General Equilibrium Analysis of Policy Instruments. The MobiDK Project, Ministry
of Business and Industry, Copenhagen.
Jerkkola, J., J. , and J. Pohjola, 1993: A CGE Model for Finnish Environmental
and Energy Policy Analysis: Effects of Stabilizing CO2 Emissions. Discussion
papers No. 5, Helsinki School of Economics, Helsinki.
Jiang, K., X. Hu, Y. Matsuoka, and T. Morita, 1998: Energy Technology
Changes and CO2 Emission Scenarios in China. Environmental Economics and Policy
Studies, 1(2), 141-160.
Jochem, E., 1998: Policy Scenarios 2005 and 2020 Using Results
of Bottom-Up Models for Policy Design in Germany. Working Paper, Fraunhofer
Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 1-4.
Johnsen, T.A., B. M. Larsen, and H. T. Mysen, 1996: Economic impacts
of a CO2 tax. In MSG-EE: An Applied General Equilibrium Model for Energy and
Environmental Analyses. K. H. Alfsen, T. Bye, E. Holmøy, (eds.), Social
and Economic Studies 96, Statistics Norway.
Jorgenson, D.W., 1997: How Economics Can Inform the Climate Change Debate.
AEI Conference Summaries, May 1997, American Enterprise Institute for Public
Policy Research. (http://www.aei.org/cs/cs7755.htm.).
Jorgenson, D.W., and P.J. Wilcoxen, 1995: Reducing U.S. Carbon Emissions:
An Econometric General Equilibrium Assessment. In Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide
Emissions: Costs and Policy Options. D. Gaskins, J. Weyant, (eds.), Stanford
University Press, Stanford, CA (forthcoming).
Kainuma, M., Y. Matsuoka, T. Morita, and G. Hibino, 1999: Development
of an End-Use Model for Analyzing Policy Options to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Applications
and Reviews, 29(3 August), 317-323.
Kainuma, M., Y. Matsuoka, and T. Morita, 2000: The AIM/End-Use Model
and its Application to Forecast Japanese Carbon Dioxide Emissions. European
Journal of Operational Research.
Kanudia, A., and R. Loulou 1998a: Robust Responses to Climate Change
via Stochastic MARKAL: The Case of Québec. European Journal of Operations
Research, 106, 15-30.
Keohane, R. and J.S. Nye, 1998: Power and Interdependence in the Information
Age. Foreign-Affairs; 77(5), pp. 81-94.
Kline, S., and N. Rosenberg, 1986: An Overview of Innovation. In The
Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology For Economic Growth. R. Landau,
N. Rosenberg (eds.), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275-305.
Koomey, J., C. Richey, S. Laitner, R. Markel, and C. Marnay, 1998: Technology
and GHG Amissions: An Integrated Analysis using the LBNL-NEMS Model. Technical
Report LBNL-42054, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA.
Kram, T., 1999a: Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme-ETSAP:
History, the ETSAP Kyoto Statement and Post-Kyoto Analysis. In Energy Models
for Decision Support: New Challenges and Possible Solution, Proceedings of conference
in Berlin, May 4-5, 1998, Laege and Schaumann, (eds.), OECD, ETSAP, pp. 23-42.
Kram, T. (Project Head), 1999b: Dealing with Uncertainty Together. Summary
of Annex VI (1996-1998). International Energy Agency, Energy Technology Systems
Analysis Programme (ETSAP), 83 pp.
Krause, F., 1995: Cutting Carbon Emissions: Burden or Benefit? Executive
Summary. In Energy Policy in the Greenhouse, IPSEP.
Krause, F., 1996: The Costs of Mitigating Carbon Emissions: A Review
of Methods and Findings from European Studies. Energy Policy, Special Issue
on the Second UN IPCC Assessment Report, Working Group III, 24 (10/11),
899-915.
Krause, F., J. Koomey, and D. Olivier, 1999: Cutting Carbon Emissions
while Saving Money: Low Risk Strategies for the European Union. Executive Summary.In
Energy Policy in the Greenhouse, Vol. II, Part 2, IPSEP, International Project
for Sustainable Energy Paths, El Cerrito, CA, November, 33 pp.
Krupnick, A., D. Burtraw, and A. Markandya, 2000: The Ancillary Benefits
and Costs of Climate Change Mitigation: A conceptual Framework. Expert Workshop
on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies,
March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Kverndokk, S., and K. E. Rosendahl, 2000: CO2 Mitigation Costs And Ancillary
Benefits in the Nordic Countries, the UK and Ireland: A survey. Memorandum 34/2000,
Department of Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Kydes, A.S., 1999: Energy Intensity and Carbon Emission Responses to
Technological Change: The U.S. Outlook. The Energy Journal, 20(3), 93-121.
Kypreos, S., 1998: The Global MARKAL-MACRO Trade Model. In Energy Models
for Decision Support: New Challenges and Possible Solutions, Conference Proceedings,
Berlin, May 4-5, 1998, Laege and Schaumann, (eds),. Paris, OECD, ETSAP, pp.
99-112.
Kypreos, S., and L. Barreto, 1999: A Simple Global Electricity MARKAL
Model with Endogenous Learning. Villigen, Paul Scherrer Institute, General Energy
Research Department-ENE, Energy Modeling Group, 24 pp.
Kypreos, S., Barreto, L., Capros, P. and Messner, S., 2000: ERIS: A model
prototype with endogenous technological change, International Journal of Global
Energy Issues, 14(1,2,3,4):374-397.
Laffont, J.J., and J. Tirole, 1993: A Theory of Incentives in Procurement
and Regulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Laitner, J.A., 1997: The Benefits of Technology Investment as a Climate
Change Policy. Proceedings of the 18th North American Conference of the USAEE/IAEE,
September 7-10, San Francisco, CA.
Laitner, J.A., 1999: Modeling the Influences of Technology Policy, Organizational
Structure, and Market Characteristics on the Economic Evaluation of Climate
Change Policies. Proceedings of ACEEE Industrial Summer Study, Saratoga Springs,
NY. June.
La Rovere, E.L., L.F.L. Legey, and J.D.G. Miguez, 1994: Alternative Energy
Strategies for Abatement of Carbon Emissions in Brazil. Energy Policy, 22(11),
pp. 914-924.
Larsson, T., P.E. Grohnheit and, F. Unander, 1998: Common Action and
Electricity Trade in Northern Europe. International Transactions in Operational
Research, 5(1), 3-11.
LEAP, 1995: Use Guide for Version 95 of the LEAP Model. Tellus Institute,
Boston Centre, Boston, MA.
Lecocq, F., J-C. Hourcade, and T. Lepesant, 1999: Equity, Uncertainty
and the Robustness of Entitlement Rules. IIASA, EMF, IEA Conference on Energy
Modelling, Paris, June 16-18.
Lee, R., A.J. Krupnick, D. Burtraw, et al., 1995: Estimating Externalities
of Electric Fuel Cycles: Analytical Methods and Issues and Estimating Externalities
of Coal Fuel Cycles. McGraw-Hill/Utility Data Institute, Washington, DC.
Lindholt, L., 1999: Beyond Kyoto: CO2 Permit Prices and the Markets for
Fossil Fuels. Discussion Paper 258, Statistics Norway, Oslo, 45pp.
Linn, W. S., Y. Szlachcic, H. Gong, Jr., P. L. Kinney and K. T. Berhane,
2000. Air pollution and Daily Hospital Admissions in Metropolitan Los Angeles.
Occup Environ Med 57(7), pp 477-483.
Lloyd, P. 1994: Aggregation by industry in high-dimensional models. Review
of International Economics, 2(2), 97-111.
Loulou, R., and D. Lavigne, 1996: MARKAL Model with Elastic Demands:
Application to GHG Emission Control. In Operations Research and Environmental
Engineering. C. Carraro, A. Haurie (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
pp. 201-220.
Loulou. R., and A. Kanudia, 1998: The Kyoto Protocol, Inter-Provincial
Cooperation and Energy Trading: A Systems Analysis with Integrated MARKAL Models.
Energy Studies Review.
Loulou, R., and A. Kanudia, 1999a. The Regional and Global Economic Analysis
of GHG Mitigation Issue via Technology-Rich Models: A North American Example.
International Modelling Conference, Paris, 15-17 June 1999, IEA/EMF/IIASA, 27
pp.
Loulou, R., and A. Kanudia, 1999b: Minimax Regret Strategies for Greenhouse
Gas Abatement: Methodology and Application. Operations Research Letters.
Loulou, R., A. Kanudia, and D. Lavigne, 1998: GHG Abatement in Central
Canada with Inter-provincial Cooperation. Energy Studies Review, 8(2),
120-129 (This volume is dated 1996, but appeared in January 1998).
Loulou, R., A. Kanudia, M. Labriet, K. Vaillancourt, and M. Margolick,
2000: Integration of GHG Abatement Options for Canada with the MARKAL Model.
Report prepared for the National Process on Climate Change and the Analysis
and Modelling Group, Canadian Government, 232 pp.
Lvovsky, K. and G. Hughes, 1997: An Approach to Projecting Ambient Concentrations
of SO2 and PM-10. Unpublished Annex 3.2 to World Bank (1997).
Manne, A.S., and J. Oliveira-Martins, 1994: Comparisons of model structure
and policy scenarios: GREEN and 12RT. Draft, Annex to the WP1 Paper on Policy
Response to the Threat of Global Warming, OECD Model Comparison Project (II),
OECD, Paris.
Martin, J.B., J-M. Burniaux, and O. Martins, 1992: The Costs of International
Agreements to Reduce CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Green. OECD Journal Studies,
19 (Winter).
McDougall, R., and P. Dixon, 1996: Analysing the Economy-wide Effects
of an Energy Tax: Results for Australia from the ORANI-E Model. In Greenhouse:
Coping with Climate Change. W. Bouma, G. Pearman, M. Manning, (eds.), CSIRO
Publishing, Melbourne, Australia.
McKibbin, W., and P. Wilcoxen, 1995: The Theoretical and Empirical Structure
of the G-Cubed Model. Brookings: Discussion Papers. International Economics,
118.
McKibbin, W., M. Ross, R. Shackleton, and P. Wilcoxen, 1999: Emissions
Trading, Capital Flows and the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal (Special Issue),
287-333.
Messner, S., 1995. Endogenized Technological Learning in an Energy Systems
Model. I.I.A.S.A. Working Paper WP-95-114, Laxenburg, Austria.
Messner, S., 1997: Endogenized Technological Learning in an Energy Systems
Model. Journal of Evolutionary-Economics; 7(3), pp. 291-313.
Mielnik, O., and J. Goldemberg, 2000: Converging to a Common Pattern
of Energy Use in Developing and Industrialised Countries. Energy Policy, 23(8),
503-508.
Mongia, N., Sathaye, J., Mongia, P., 1994: Energy Use and Carbon Implications
in India. Energy Policy, 22(11), pp. 894-906.
Morgenstern, R.D., 2000: Baseline Issues in the Estimation of the Ancillary
Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies. Expert Workshop on Assessing
the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March
27-29, Washington, DC.
Nakicenovic, N., 1997: Technological Change and Learning. Perspectives
in Energy, Quarterly of Moscow International Energy Club and the International
Academy of Energy, 4(2), 173-189.
Navrud, S. 1994: Economic valuation of the external costs of fuel cycles.
Testing the benefit transfer approach.. In Models for Integrated Electricity
Resource Planning, A.T. Almeida, (ed.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht,
pp. 49-66.
Nilsson, C., 1999: Unilateral versus Multilateral Carbon Dioxide Tax
Implementations - A Numerical Analysis with the European Model - GEM-E3. Preliminary
Version. National Institute of Economic Research, Stockholm.
Nystrom, I., and C. Wene, 1999: Energy-Economy Linking in MARKAL-MACRO:
Interplay of Nuclear, Conservation and CO2 Policies in Sweden. Working Paper.
Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg,
Sweden.
ODonoghue, C., 1997: Carbon Dioxide, Energy Taxes and Household
Income. Working paper 90, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), 1995:
Climate Change, Economic Instruments and Income Distribution, OECD, Paris.
OECD, 2000: Ancillary benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation.
Proceedings of an IPCC Co-sponsored Workshop, 27-29 March 2000, Washington,
DC.
Office of the President of the United States, 1998: The Kyoto Protocol
and the Presidents Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration
Economic Analysis, July 1998.
Oliveira-Martins, J. and P. Sturn, 1998: Efficiency and Distribution
in Computable Models of Carbon Emission Abatement. Economics Department Working
Papers (OECD).
Oliveira-Martins, J., J-M. Burniaux, and J.P. Martin, 1992: Trade and
The Effectiveness of Unilateral CO2 -Abatement Policies: Evidence from GREEN.
OECD Economic Studies(19), 123-140.
Olson, M., 1965: Logic of collective action. Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, MA.
Ostertag, K., 1999: Transaction Costs of Raising Energy Efficiency. Working
Paper, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI)/Centre
International de Recherche sur lEnvironnement et le Development (CIRED),
Karlsruhe, Germany/Nogent sur Marne, France, February 1999, pp. 1-15.
Ostro, B.D. 1996: A Methodology for Estimating Air Pollution Health Effects.
Office of Global and Integrated Environmental Health, World Health Organization,
Geneva.
Palmer, K., W. Oats, and P. Portney, 1995: Tightening Environmental Standards:
the Benefit-Cost or the No Cost Paradigm. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
9(4), 119-132.
Parry, I.W.H., 1997: Environmental Taxes and Quotas in the Presence of
Distorting Taxes in Factor Markets. Resource and Energy Economics 19,
203-220.
Parry, I.W.H., and A.M. Bento, 2000: Tax-Deductions, Environmental Policy
and the Double Dividend Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics
and Management, 39 (1), 67-96.
Parry, I.W.H., R. Williams, and L.H. Goulder, 1999: When Can Carbon Abatement
Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets.
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, January.
Pearce, D.,1992: The Secondary Benefits Of Greenhouse Gas Control. Working
Paper GEC 92-12, CSERGE, University College London and University of East Anglia,
UK.
Pearce, D., 2000: Policy Frameworks for the Ancillary Benefits of Climate
Change Policies. Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs
of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March 27-29, Washington, DC.
Pechan, E.H. & Associates, 1997. Estimating Global Energy Policy
Effects on Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations. Pechan Report No. 10.001/2116.
Pereira, L., D. Loomis, G. Conceicao, A. Braga, R. Arcas, H.kishi, J.
Songer, G. Bohm, and P. Saldiva, 1998: Association between Air Pollution and
Intrauterine Mortality in Sao Paulo Brazil. Environmental Health Perspectives,
106, 325-329.
Pezzey, J., 1992: Analysis of Unilateral CO2 Control in the European
Community and OECD. The Energy Journal, 13(3), 159-71.
Pizer, W., 1997: Prices versus Quantities revisited: the Case of Climate
Change. RFF Discussion Paper 98-02. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
Pope III, C. A., M. J. Thun, et al., 1995: Particulate Air Pollution
as a Predictor of Mortality in a Prospective Study of U.S. adults. American
Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 151, 669-674.
Porter, M., and C. van der Linde, 1995: Towards a New Conception of the
Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
9(4), 97-118.
Poterba, J., 1991: Tax Policy to Combat Global Warming : On Designing
a Carbon Tax. In Global Warming : Economic Policy Responses. R. Dornbush, J.M.
Poterba, (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Proost, S., and D van Regemorter, 1995: The Double Dividend and the role
of Inequality Aversion and Macroeconomic Regimes. International Taxes and Public
Finances, 2, 217-219.
Read, P., 1999: Cooperative Implementation After Kyoto: Joint Implementation
and the Need for Commercialized Offsets Trading. In On the Compatibility of
Flexible Instruments. C. Jepma, W. van der Gaast, (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht.
Reilly, J., R. Prinn, J. Harnisch, J. Fitzmaurice, H. Jacoby, D. Kicklighter,
J. Melillo, P. Stone, A. Sokolov, and C. Wang. 1999: Multi-Gas Assessment of
the Kyoto Protocol. Nature, 401, 549-555.
Rothman, D.S., 2000: Estimating Ancillary Impacts, Benefits, and Costs
on Ecosystems from Proposed GHG Mitigation Policies. Expert Workshop on Assessing
the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, March
27-29, Washington, DC.
Sathaye, J., and N.H. Ravindranath, 1998: Climate Change Mitigation in
the Energy and Forestry sectors of developing countries. Annual Review of Energy
and Environment, 23, 387-437.
Sato, O., M. Shimoda, K. Tatemasu, and Y. Tadokoro, 1999: Roles of Nuclear
Energy in Japans Future Energy System. English summary of the JAERI technical
paper 99-015, March.
Scheraga, J.D. and N.A. Leary, 1993: Costs and Side Benefits of using
Energy Taxes to Mitigate Global Climate Change. Proceedings 1993 National Tax
Journal, pp. 133-138.
Schubert, K. , and O. Beaumais, 1998: Fiscalité, marché
de droits à polluer et équilibre général: application
à la France. In Lenvironnement , une nouvelle dimension de lanalyse
économique. K. Schubert, P. Zagamé, (eds), Vuibert, France
Schneider, S.H., and L.H. Goulder, 1997: Achieving Carbon Dioxide Emissions
Reductions at Low Cost. Nature, 389, 4 September.
Seebregts, A.J., T. Kram, G.J. Schaeffer, and A.J.M. Bos, 1999a: Modelling
Technological Progress in a MARKAL Model for Western Europe including Clusters
of Technologies. European IAEE/AEE Conference: Technological Progress and the
Energy Challenge, Paris, 30 Sept -1 Oct 1999, 16 pp.
Seebregts, A., T. Kram, G. Schaeffer, A. Stoffer, S. Kypreos, L. Barreto,
S. Messner and L. Schrattenholzer, 1999b: Endogenous Technological Change
in Energy System Models - A Synthesis of Experience with ERIS, MARKAL, and MESSAGE.
Working Paper, ECN-C-99-025, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Petten,
The Netherlands, April, pp. 1-29.
Shackleton, R., M. Shelby, A. Cristofaro, R. Brinner, J. Yanchar, L.
Goulder, D. Jorgenson, P. Wilcoxen, and P. Pauly, 1996: The Efficiency Value
of Carbon Tax Revenues. In Reducing Global Carbon Dioxide Emissions: Costs and
Policy Options. D. Gaskin, J. Weyant, (eds.), Energy Modelling Forum, Stanford,
CA.
Shackleton, R., 1998: The Potential Effects of International Carbon Emission
Permit Trading Under the Kyoto Protocol. OECD Experts Workshop on Climate Change
and Economic Modelling : Background Analysis for the Kyoto Protocol, Room Document
n°8.
Shukla, P.R., 1996: The Modelling of Policy Options for Greenhouse Gas
Mitigation in India. Ambio, 24(4), 240-248.
Sinclair, P., 1992: High does nothing and rising is worse: Carbon Taxes
should keep Declining to Cut Harmful Emissions. Manchester School of Economic
and Social Studies, 60(1), 41-52.
Smith, S., 1998: Distibutional Incidence of Environmental Taxes on Energy
and Carbon: A Review of Policy Issues. Paper presented at Colloque du Ministere
de lEnvironnnement et de lAmenagement du Territoire, Toulouse, 13
May 1998.
Symons, E., J. Proops, and P. Gay, 1994: Carbon Taxes, Consumer Demand
and Carbon Dioxide Emissions: A Simulation Analysis for the UK. Fiscal Studies,
15(2), 9-43.
Tahvonen, O., 1997: Fossil fuels, stock externalities and backstop technology.
Canadian Journal of Economics, 30(4), 855-874.
Tseng, P., J. Lee, S. Kypreos, and L. Barreto, 1999: Technology Learning
and the Role of Renewable Energy in Reducing Carbon Emissions. International
Workshop on Technologies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Engineering-Economic
Analysis of Conserved Energy and Carbon, Washington, May, 1999.
Tulpulé, V., S. Brown, J. Lim, C. Polidano, H. Pant, and B. Fisher,
1999: An Economic Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol Using the Global Trade and
Environment Model. The Energy Journal (Special Issue) 257-285.
Ulph, A., and D. Ulph, 1994. The Optimal Time Path of a Carbon Tax. Oxford
Economic Papers, 46(5), 857-868.
UNEP, 1994a: UNEP GHG Abatement Costing Studies. Collaborating Centre
on Energy and Environment, Risø National Laboratory, Denmark.
UNEP, 1994b: UNEP Greenhouse Gas Abatement Costing Studies. Part One:
Main Report. UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Risø
National Laboratory, Denmark.
UNEP, 1999a: Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series
Argentina.
1999b. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Ecuador
1999c. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Botswana
1999d. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Zambia
1999e. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Vietnam.
1999f. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Hungary.
1999g. Economics of Greenhouse Gas Limitations. Country Study Series Estonia.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment, Risø National
Laboratory, Denmark.
Unger, T., and L. Alm, 1999: Electricity and Emission Permits
trade as a Means of Curbing CO2 Emissions in the Nordic Countries. Working Paper,
Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology, Goteborg,
Sweden.
Van der Mensbrugghe, D., 1998: A (Preliminary) Analysis of the Kyoto
Protocol: Using the OECD GREEN Model. In Economic Modelling of Climate Change,
OECD, Paris, pp. 173-204.
Verikios, G. and K. Hanslow, 1999: Modelling the Effects of Implementing
the Uruguay Round: A Comparison Using the GTAP Model under Alternative Treatments
of International Capital Mobility. Paper presented to the Second Annual Conference
on Global Economic Analysis, Denmark, June 20-22, 1999.
Von Hippel, D., and B. Granada, 1993: Application of the LEAP/EDB Energy/Environment
Planning System. SEI, Boston, MA..
Wang, X., and K. Smith, 1999: Near-term Health Benefits of Greenhouse
Gas Reductions: A Proposed Assessment Method and Application in Two Energy Sectors
of China. World Health Organization, Geneva.
Weitzman, M.L., 1974: Prices versus Quantities. Review of Economic Studies,
41(4), 477-491.
Welsch, H. and F. Hoster, 1995: A General Equilibrium Analysis of European
Carbon/Energy Taxation Model Structure and Macroeconomic Results. Zeitschrift
fuer Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (ZWS), 115, 275-303.
b, J., 1999: The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation.
Special Issue of the Energy Journal. John Weyant (ed.).
Weyant, J., and T. Olavson, 1999: Issues in Modeling Induced Technological
Change in Energy, Environment, and Climate Policy. Journal of Environmental
Management and Assessment, 1, 67-85.
Wigley, T., R. Richels, and J. Edmonds, 1996: Economic and Environmental
Choices in the Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations. Nature, 379,
240-243.
Williamson, O.,1996: The Mechanisms of Governance. Oxford University
Press, New York, USA and Oxford, UK.
Working Group on Public Health and Fossil Fuel Combustion, 1997: Short-term
Improvements in Public Health from Global Climate Policies on Fossil Fuel Combustion:
An Interim Report. Lancet, 1341-1348.
Wu, Z., J. He, A., Zhang, Q. Xu, S. Zhang, and J. Sathaye, 1994: A Macro
Assessment of Technology Options for CO2 Mitigation in Chinas Energy System.
Energy Policy, 22(11), pp. 907-913.
Ybema, J.R., M. Menkveld and T. Kram, 1998: Securing Flexibility in the
Energy System to meet Future CO2 Reduction: An Inventory of hedging options.Third
Modelling Seminar on Uncertainty and Policy Choices to Meet UNFCCC Objectives,
Paris, October 16-17, 1997, Netherlands Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten.
Ybema, J.R., P. Lako, I. Kok, E. Schol, D.J. Gielen, and T. Kram, 1999:
Scenarios for Western Europe on Long Term Abatement of CO2 Emissions. Netherlands
Energy Research Foundation ECN, Petten/Dutch National Research Programme on
Global Air Pollution and Climate Change, 109 pp.
Zhang, Z.X., 1997: The Economics of Energy Policy in China: Implications
for Global Climate Change, New Horizons in Environmental Economics Series. Edward
Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
Zhang, Z.X., 1998: Macroeconomic Effects of CO2 Emission Limits: A Computable
General Equilibrium Analysis for China. Journal of Policy Modeling, 20(2),
213-250.
Other reports in this collection |