Climate Change 2001:
Working Group III: Mitigation
Other reports in this collection

Table 4.5: Biological GHG mitigation potential in Latin America
Option
Land available in
Unit C
Total C
Unit
Total
Reference
 
2030 (Mha)
sequestration
sequestration(MtC)
costb
cost
 
 
Technical
Economic
(tC/ha)
Technical
Economic
(US$/tC)
 
 
 
potential
potential
 
potential
potential
 
 
 
Native forest management
Mexico
18.7
13.2
132
2465
1550
0.1-4
4930
Masera, 1995; Masera et al., 1997a; Masera and Ordóñez, 1997
Venezuela
9.8
 
75
735
 
9
6615
Bonduki and Swisher, 1995
Brazil
60
 
18
735
 
1.8
1323
Da Motta et al., 1999
Protected areas
Mexico
6
4.9
89
535
470
1-6
1872.5
Masera, 1995; Masera et al., 1997a, Masera et al. 1995 and 1997b
Venezuela
4
 
94
376
 
4
1504
Bonduki and Swisher, 1995
Brazil
151
 
18
2718
 
3
7650
Da Motta et al., 1999
Restoration plantations
Mexico
4.2
2.5
76
320
200
7
2240
Masera, 1995; Masera et al., 1997a, Masera and Ordóñez, 1997
Commercial plantations (includes energy plantations)
Mexico
6.6
2.4
208
1375
1075
5-7
8250
Masera, 1995; Masera et al., 1997a, Masera et al. 1995 and 1997b
Venezuela
4.9
 
52-62
295
 
17
5015
Bonduki and Swisher, 1995
Brazil
degraded land
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
- Pulp
 
 
24
 
 
1.4
 
Da Motta et al., 1999
- Charcoal
 
 
180
 
 
0.7
 
Da Motta et al., 1999
- Timber
 
 
43
 
 
–9.5
 
Da Motta et al., 1999
‘–’ means profitable
Agroforestry
Mexico
1.9
1.5
53
100
80
2-11
650
Masera, 1995; Masera et al., 1997a; Masera and Ordóñez, 1997; De Jong et al., 1995
Venezuela
1
 
27
27
 
20
540
Bonduki and Swisher, 1995
Total
Mexico
37.4
24.5
 
4795
3375
 
17943
 
Venezuela
19.7
 
 
1433
 
 
13674
 
Brazila
211
 
 
3453
 
 
8973
 
a Unit carbon sequestration considers the difference between sustainable and unsustainable logging. Unit price is NPV(net of present value of benefits minus present value of costs)
b Unit cost US$/tC is NPV.


Other reports in this collection