Box 4.2. Disturbance, Age-class Distribution, and their
Implications for Forest Carbon Dynamics
At the stand scale, disturbance events (both natural and anthropogenic) have three main impacts on the carbon budget (Apps and Kurz, 1993). First, they redistribute the existing carbon by transferring carbon from living material, above and below ground, to the dead organic matter pools. Second, they transfer some of the carbon out of the ecosystem (e.g., into the atmosphere as combustion products, in the case of fire, and/or into the forest product sector as raw feedstock, in the case of harvest). Third, by opening the forest canopy, the disturbance changes the site micro-environment and restarts the successional cycle for new stand development. At the scale of forests (typically comprising many stands), the disturbance
regime determines the age-class structure (e.g., the even-age structure
associated with stand-replacing disturbance regimes or the uneven-age
structures associated with individual tree mortality and gap-phase replacement),
and age-class structure of stands and trees making up the forest. The
C stocks in a forest landscape, and the changes in these stocks over time,
are strongly influenced by the age-class distribution (Kurz et al.,
1995b; Turner et al., 1995; MacLaren, 1996; Apps et al.,
2000; Bhatti et al., 2001). In managed plantation forests, the
age-class distribution is controlled by the management regime and harvest
cycle (Heath and Birdsey, 1993; MacLaren, 1996), while in natural forests
other mortality agents play a major role. See Heath et al. (1996)
and Kurz et al. (1995a) for examples. |
Land management decisions are influenced by many factors. In the temperate zone, and in the European parts of the boreal zone, these are mainly technological and economic. Agricultural production is, for example, heavily influenced by evolving technologies, economic opportunities, subsidies, and restrictions on international trade. Forestry practices are similarly influenced by economic returns, trade, and pressures from society (Clawson, 1979; Waggoner, 1994; Wernick et al., 1998). It is within these pressures and opportunities that carbon mitigation possibilities may be found, and preferably they would be region specific. Table 4.2 gives an overview of some of the specific issues of importance in the temperate and boreal zone of the world.
Competition for land between forestry and agriculture has become less severe. Forest area is increasing in many regions of the boreal and temperate zone, partly because agricultural yields have improved or because the profitability of marginal agriculture has declined. The ability to produce agricultural goods has grown faster than demand, resulting in a downwards trend in prices (Alig et al., 1990; Waggoner, 1994). Much abandoned agricultural land has reverted to forest, either naturally or through deliberate planting. Superimposed over these land conversions is a transition in forestry from a foraging and gathering operation, dependent upon primary forest, through a stage of more intensively managed forest, to total forest ecosystem management. The latter occurs when urbanized societies press for nature-oriented forest management. Continuously improving technologies allow low-cost establishment and higher productivity from planted and plantation forests (Sedjo, 1983; 1999a). In agriculture, also, practices are changing towards maintaining site fertility or decreasing the risk of erosion.Incentives for planting forests are provided by a combination of market factors and public policy. Remaining wild forests, such as the public forests in the US National Forest System and in British Columbia, are becoming less accessible and have increased harvesting restrictions. Subsidies to harvesting of natural forests are also being withdrawn elsewhere. For example, large subsidies for harvesting Russian forests were prevalent during the Soviet era, largely through subsidized transportation, but have now disappeared. The economic structures are in transition and industrial production has declined. As a result, harvests have fallen dramatically in Russia since the 1990s (Nilsson and Shvidenko 1998).
Market forces, reflecting industrial needs for wood, have provided financial
incentives for expansion of commercial forests (Sedjo and Lyon, 1990). This
is a trend expected to continue, because of growing demand for industrial wood
and low profitability in agriculture (Sohngen et al., 1999). Early analyses
suggested that economic returns from plantations (in the tropics as well as
in the temperate and boreal zone) justify investment in a number of regions
(Sedjo, 1983). Recent studies confirm that forest plantations are being established
at a rate of 600,000ha/yr (Pandey, 1992; Postel and Heise, 1988; UN-ECE/FAO,
2000). However, industrial plantation forestry is new in many tropical areas
and yields vary considerably across ecosystems. In many locations where plantations
have only recently been established, little is known about the potential capabilities
for increasing productivity as well as the potential problems that may limit
yields.
Table 4.2: Overview of biological carbon
mitigation issues and opportunities in selected countries/regions (Based, in part, on Sedjo and Lyon, 1990; Fujimori, 1997; Nilsson and Shvidenko, 1998; De Camino et al., 1999; Sohngen et al., 1999; Zhang, 1996) |
||
Region | Issues | Options to store carbon arising from the issues |
USA/Canada |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Russia |
|
|
Japan |
|
|
China |
|
|
Australia/ New Zealand |
|
|
Argentina, Chile, Brazil |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Other reports in this collection |