Climate Change 2001:
Working Group III: Mitigation
Other reports in this collection

3.8 Energy Supply, Including Non-Renewable and Renewable Resources and Physical CO2 Removal

3.8.1 Introduction

This section reviews the major advances in the area of GHG mitigation options for the electricity and primary energy supply industries that have emerged since IPCC (1996). The global electricity supply sector accounted for almost 2,100MtC/yr or 37.5% of total carbon emissions. Under business-as-usual conditions, annual carbon emissions associated with electricity generation, including combined heat and power production, is projected to surpass the 4,000MtC mark by 2020 (IEA, 1998b). Because a limited number of centralized and large emitters are easier to control than millions of vehicle emitters or small boilers, the electricity sector is likely to become a prime target under any future involving GHG emission controls and mitigation.

3.8.2 Summary of the Second Assessment Report

Chapter 19 of the IPCC Second Assessment Report (1996) gave a comprehensive guide to mitigation options in energy supply (Ishitani and Johansson, 1996). The chapter described technological options for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in five broad areas:

The chapter also noted that some technological options, such as CCGTs, can penetrate the current market place, whereas others need government support by improving market efficiency, by finding new ways to internalize external costs, by accelerating R&D, and by providing temporary incentives for early market development of new technologies as they approach commercial readiness. The importance of transferring efficient technologies to developing countries, including technologies in the residential and industrial sectors and not just in power generation, was noted.

The Energy Primer of the IPCC Second Assessment Report (Nakicenovic et al., 1996) gave estimates of energy reserves and resources, including the potential for various nuclear and renewable technologies which have since been updated (WEC, 1998b; Goldemberg, 2000; BGR, 1998). A current version of the estimates for fossil fuels and uranium is given in Table 3.28a. The potential for renewable forms of energy is discussed later.

A variety of terms are used in the literature to describe fossil fuel deposits, and different authors and institutions have various meanings for the same terms which also vary for different fossil fuel sources. The World Energy Council defines resources as “the occurrences of material in recognisable form” (WEC, 1998b). For oil and gas, this is essentially the amount of oil and gas in the ground. Reserves represent a portion of these resources and is the term used by the extraction industry. British Petroleum notes that proven reserves of oil are “generally taken to be those quantities that geological and engineering information indicates with reasonable certainty can be recovered in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions” (BP, 1999). Resources, therefore, are hydrocarbon deposits that do not meet the criteria of proven reserves, at least not yet. Future advances in the geosciences and upstream technologies – as in the past – will improve knowledge of and access to resources and, if demand exists, convert these into reserves. Market conditions can either accelerate or even reverse this process.

The difference between conventional and unconventional occurrences (oil shale, tar sands, coalbed methane, clathrates, uranium in black shale or dissolved in sea water) is either the nature of existence (being solid rather than liquid for oil) or the geological location (coal bed methane or clathrates, i.e., frozen ice-like deposits that probably cover a significant portion of the ocean floor). Unconventional deposits require different and more complex production methods and, in the case of oil, need additional upgrading to usable fuels. In essence, unconventional resources are more capital intensive (for development, production, and upgrading) than conventional ones. The prospects for unconventional resources depend on the rate and costs at which these can be converted into quasi-conventional reserves.

Table 3.28a: Aggregation of fossil energy occurrences and uranium, in EJ
Consumption
Reserves
Resourcesa
 Resources
baseb
Additional
occurrences 
1860-1998
1998
 
 
Oil          
 
   Conventional
4,854
132.7
5,899
7,663
13,562
 
   Unconventional
285
9.2
6,604
15,410
22,014
61,000
Natural gasc
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Conventional
2,346
80.2
5,358
11,681
17,179
 
   Unconventional
33
4.2
8,039
10,802
18,841
16,000
   Clathrates
 
 
 
 
 
780,000
Coal
5,990
92.2
41,994
100,358
142,351
121,000
Total fossil occurrences
13,508
319.3
69,214
142,980
212,193
992,000
Uranium – once through fuel cycled
1,100
17.5
1,977
5,723
7,700
2,000,000e
Uranium – reprocessing & breedingf
 
 
120,000
342,000
462,000
>120,000,000
a. Reserves to be discovered or resources to be developed as reserves
b. Resources base is the sum of reserves and resources
c. Includes natural gas liquids
d. Adapted from OECD/NEA and IAEA, 2000. Thermal energy values are reactor technology dependent and based on an average thermal energy equivalent of 500 TJ per t U. In addition, there are secondary uranium sources such as fissile material from national or utility stockpiles, reprocessing former military materials, and from re-enriched depleted uranium
e. Includes uranium from sea water
f. Natural uranium reserves and resources are about 60 times larger if fast breeder reactors are used (Nakicenovic et al., 1996)



Other reports in this collection